http://www.neurology.org/cgi/content/abstract/57/5/845
Neurology 2001;57:845-852
© 2001 American Academy of
Neurology
Results of a pilot study in relapsing-remitting
MS
S. A. Brod, MD;, J. W. Lindsey,
MD;, F. S. Vriesendorp, MD;, C. Ahn, PhD;, E. Henninger, P. A. Narayana,
PhD; and J. S. Wolinsky, MD
From the Departments of Neurology
(Drs. Brod, Lindsey, Vriesendorp, and Wolinsky, and Ms. Henninger), Internal
Medicine (Dr. Ahn), and Radiology (Dr. Narayana), University of Texas–Houston.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Staley A. Brod, University of Texas-Houston, Health Science Center, Department of Neurology, Suite 7.044, P.O. Box 20708, Houston, TX 77225; e-mail: Staley.A.Brod@uth.tmc.edu
Objective:
To investigate whether ingested human
recombinant interferon-2a (IFN-2a) was safe and whether treatment reduces
the number of gadolinium-enhanced lesions on serial MRI in patients with
active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS).
Methods:
Entry criteria included clinically
definite RRMS and one or more gadolinium-enhanced lesions on a screening
MRI.
Results:
Of 80 patients screened, 33 were
eligible and 30 patients were enrolled for treatment. Patients were randomized
(10 per group) to placebo, 10,000 or 30,000 IU IFN-2a ingested on alternate
days for 9 months. They were examined clinically and with monthly cerebral
MRI. Sample size projections were based on the assumption of a parenteral
IFN-like effect, a 90% reduction of enhancing lesions evident within 1
month of the initiation of treatment in the active treatment groups sustained
during the 9-month study as the primary outcome variable.
Results:
There was no significant effect on
enhancing lesions. However, post hoc analysis suggested a possible treatment
effect in the 10,000 IU group. By direct monthly comparison of placebo
and 10,000 IU group in treatment month 5, there were 73% (p < 0.05)
fewer enhancements in the 10,000 IU group than in the placebo group. There
was a decrease of tumor necrosis factor- protein secretion at months 4
and 5. Relapses and adverse events were not different among the treatment
groups. Ingested IFN-2a did not induce systemic anti-IFN- antibodies.
Conclusions:
This trial showed no benefit based
on the primary outcome measure. Because changes were detected in immune
response and post hoc analysis suggested that a smaller dose could have
an effect, IFN- may deserve further study.
Copyright © 2001 by AAN Enterprises,
Inc