http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011018/hl/righttodie_1.html
Thursday October 18 10:16 AM ET
LONDON (Reuters) - A terminally ill
British woman lost a landmark court battle on Thursday to "die with dignity"
but promptly said she would appeal the ruling, which is a major blow to
supporters of euthanasia.
Mother-of-two Diane Pretty, 42, who
has motor neurone disease, had wanted her husband Brian to be immune from
prosecution if he helped her commit suicide.
"She wants to fight so she wants
to take it further. I think she will be going to the House of Lords. She...told
me this minute," Brian said outside court, translating for his wife who
can barely speak but was at his side in a wheelchair.
"She is disappointed. Angry. She
is feeling angry. But it is only expected because she feels she has got
a right to do what she feels is right," he added.
In a test case that underscores Britain's
long-standing legal block on euthanasia, three High Court judges dismissed
Pretty's case and denied her permission to appeal their ruling except to
the House of Lords.
"Having regard to the fact that
we have said that the conclusion we have reached is inescapable, we do
not think it appropriate to give permission to appeal," Lord Justice Simon
Tuckey said.
The Prettys claimed the refusal to
allow the assisted suicide infringed their human rights by subjecting Diane
to degrading treatment and by failing to respect her private life.
But Lord Justice Tuckey said her
human right was "to live with dignity, not die with dignity."
"VIOLATION OF RIGHTS"
During a hearing earlier this month,
Philip Havers QC, representing the Prettys, told the court that to deny
Pretty the right to die with dignity was a violation of her rights.
But in giving his ruling, Lord Justice
Tuckey said the law gave greater priority to the right to life than the
right for a person to do what they liked with their own body.
"English law curtails a person's
right to bodily autonomy in the interests of protecting that person's life
even against her own wishes," he said. "Thus deliberate killing, even
with consent and in the most pitiable of circumstances, is murder."
Pro-life groups and the Catholic
Church hailed the ruling.
"We welcome the decision, which
has been made for the right reasons," Paul Tully, general secretary of
the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, said in a statement.
"The court...has rightly upheld
the law prohibiting euthanasia and assisted suicide, which is there not
least to protect the weak and especially vulnerable older people. It is
right to alleviate suffering; it is wrong intentionally to kill," Catholic
Bishop Peter Smith said.
Pretty is paralysed from the neck
down and is too disabled to kill herself. Helping a person commit suicide
carries a maximum 14-year jail term.
Pretty, diagnosed as suffering from
motor neurone disease in 1999, lives with her husband, daughter and granddaughter.
Her disease is now at an advanced
stage and she has to be fed through a tube. Her intellect and decision-making
capacity are unimpaired.
Copyright © 2001 Reuters Limited