http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,600-2001380788,00.html
WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 07 2001
Dr Thomas Stuttaford, The Times
medical expert, answers your questions on multiple sclerosis.
Dr Stuttaford’s replies cannot apply to individual cases and should be taken in a general context. Please consult your GP if you suffer from any health or special conditions.
Q - My 21-year-old granddaughter has been diagnosed with optic neuritis. She has been told that this condition generally leads to multiple sclerosis (MS), although she has no other symptoms at present.
a)
Could this be a "one-off" attack?
b)
Can the nerve regenerate itself?
c)
Is the development of MS inevitable at some stage in her life?
d)
Is there anything she could do now to help prevent progression of the disease?
Mrs M Slamer (address withheld)
A - It is true that a great many cases of MS start with symptoms which are derived from optic neuritis – but there are many other causes of optic neuritis. I don’t, of course, know your granddaughter so I can’t comment on her case, but I would assume that she has had MRI scans done and that there is some other evidence that “the condition generally leads to MS”.
I many cases in which no other evidence of MS is found, and there is no other obvious cause such as temporal arteritis, exposure to chemicals, allergy to bee stings, etc, the cause of the optic neuritis is never discovered.
In all cases of multiple sclerosis an important feature of the treatment is for the patient to have a relaxing life. They should avoid either extreme emotional or physical stress, they shouldn’t be exposed to extremes of temperature – in particular heat – and so far as possible they should avoid fevers. Heat is a very common cause of relapse in MS and holidays should therefore be taken in temperate zones; there shouldn’t be any baking on Mediterranean beaches.
Some people swear by diets, but trials have proved rather disappointing.
In most cases
of MS there is initially a relaxing and remitting pattern to the disease
– it waxes and wanes – and there is a very considerable degree of repair
of the myelin sheath in between relapses. If the optic neuritis were
a result of any other disease process, this would not necessarily be so.
Q - The
medical profession as a rule doesn't recommend nutritional therapy, yet
in my own experience as a member of an active MS diet group (http://www.ms-diet.org)
which follow strict recommendations, it is extremely beneficial and
more effective than drugs. Do you agree it's about time that
dietary changes were considered as an economical, effective way of treating
MS?
Mrs Anne Barrett
(address withheld)
I am delighted
to hear that you have found the diet helpful in your case. Research
on some of the popular diets used to treat MS over the years has proved
rather disappointing, but if you have found one that helps you and your
friends with the disease, that’s excellent – keep taking it. On the
other hand, it is important not to renounce the standard treatments, the
beta interferons if you can get them, or Copaxone glatiramer acetate, which
are of proven value. The advent of these drugs, which modify the
disease process, has rather taken the spotlight off the use of steroids.
For many years steroids were the lynchpin of treatment and these too shouldn’t
be disregarded.
In this country
we have been very tardy in our use of beta interferons and Copaxone, but
in other parts of the world, they are more extensively used and have proved
very valuable.
Q -
I understand that MS sufferers can be affected in different ways, for example
not all of them end up in wheelchairs. Can you put some approximate figures
against the different levels of impairment, please?
John Smith
(address withheld)
A - MS
is a very variable disease. Thirty-odd years ago I frequently used
to see a very prominent bishop, and I met him each year on numerous occasions.
One day I was walking through his darkened study on the way to see one
of his staff when a voice from the sofa said: "could you turn the
light on for me, Tommy". I turned it on and asked him why he hadn’t
done it himself, and he explained that he had had his first attack of multiple
sclerosis while a student, but it had run such a long and protracted course
that he had been able to serve in the navy during the war and had been
an explorer. The attacks, when they came, were quite paralysing but
within two or three weeks he was back on his feet and none of his flock
had found out why he was away. This man had had the disease for about
40 years when I knew him, and he went on to live a normal lifespan.
In general
we divide MS into four types.
a) Relapsing-remitting
MS - 40 per cent. These patients have periods of complete, or near
complete, remission and are like my bishop.
b) The second
type is secondary-progressive. These are the people who have relapsing-remitting
MS but after a great number of years begin a slow but steady decline as
a result of their neurological symptoms. Forty per cent of people
with MS can be included in this group.
c) The next
group are those with primary-progressive MS. These people share increasing
symptoms from the start and there is no evidence of any remission from
the progress of the disease. Only ten per cent of patients follow
this course.
d) The last
type of MS is benign multiple sclerosis. These patients have a few,
usually sensory, symptoms and then have a complete remission of all symptoms
very often for 10 to 15 years, or even longer. The usual accepted
figure for people with this form is 10 per cent but some authorities would
put it as high as 20 per cent.
It is a characteristic
of MS that it does run different courses, and perhaps the manifestation
of this is that the exact percentages included in the four different presentations
of it and pattern of behaviour of the disease varies according to the expert
discussing the disease.
The average
duration of life after onset of symptoms is thought to be about 30 years,
15 per cent die within ten years and one third within 15 years. It shouldn't
be forgotten that in 20 per cent of patients there is no appreciable disability
after 10 to 15 years.
Q -
My wife was diagnosed with MS about 20 months ago and the diagnosis was
"mildly progressive". Is this basically the same disease as other variants?
Typically, what is the time lag before the condition becomes more serious?
My wife feels that she has a time bomb waiting to explode.
We met an American
research professor a couple of years ago, and he advised that there were
successful trials in reattaching myelin to rats. Are you aware if this
research has been progressed to humans? He was very confidant that a cure
would be found within five years. Your advice would be appreciated.
Frank Tiller,
Chigwell
A - I
suppose that any patient who is labelled as being mildly progressive would
be considered to have the primary progressive type of MS, but one that
is running a very slow course and it not causing at the moment much in
the way of disability. I suspect that it is the same disease as we
have discussed in answer to other questions.
MS is usually,
but not always, a very slowly progressive disease with a course running
into a great many years. It is impossible to generalise, but if one
tries to generalise at all it would be to say that it is older men who
develop their first symptoms in middle age or later who have the most rapid
form of the trouble.
I think that
the American research professor was indeed a very optimistic and confident
man to predict a cure for MS within five years. Certainly there is
a huge amount of research into the myelin sheath in MS, but I wasn’t aware
that there was any way of reattaching it to the nerves. As you know,
the myelin is similar to the insulation around an electric wire and if
the myelin breaks up as a result of inflammation, the nerve doesn’t work
as the impulses travelling along it are interrupted. The usual teaching
is that the nerve fibre damage can be irreversible so that unless the myelin
sheath could be reattached fairly early, there would be some residual symptoms.
I think that
the disease modifying drugs such as beta interferon and Copaxone do represent
an enormous advance in the treatment of some forms of MS – the greatest
advance that I have seen in my lifetime. There is always a hope that
we will understand the reasons why the myelin sheath is attacked by the
body’s immune system and will find a way of overcoming this, but I don’t
think there’s any guarantee that it will be within the next five years.
Q -
My daughter, aged 38, has the benign form of MS. This was diagnosed 11
years ago and since then, she has had very few troublesome symptoms; the
main symptom, extreme fatigue, can occur after a very busy time or extra
stress, and an early night usually helps. I have heard that hyperbaric
oxygen treatment is beneficial in this type of MS. Could you comment please?
Lesley Loddington,
Poulton-le-Fylde, Lancs
A - I
am delighted that you have stressed the importance of lifestyle in the
treatment of MS, and the need to avoid extreme fatigue. Violent physical
exercise, which exhausts the body, should be avoided. Your daughter
must avoid the temptation to go on 20-mile hikes, climb mountains or swim
across bays. Six or seven hours’ sleep is also important, and she
must be careful not to become overheated.
Hyperbaric
oxygen treatment is a treatment in which the whole body is exposed to oxygen
at three times atmospheric pressure. These pressure chambers are
used to treat such problems as the bends in divers, or in heart or lung
disorders. About 20 years ago, I first heard of hyperbaric oxygen
being used to treat multiple sclerosis because my then editor, while on
a skiing holiday, befriended one of his fellow skiers who suddenly developed
symptoms of MS. He arranged for her to have hyperbaric oxygen treatment
and she did very well. For a time he became a great enthusiast for
it. But it was hard to find any convincing evidence that it was helpful
and that the patients who did get better wouldn’t have gone in for remission
anyway.
I can’t think
of any good reason why a young woman shouldn’t try it to see if it helps
her, but it would be worthwhile asking the Multiple Sclerosis Society (0207
371 8000) or call the national helpline on 0808 800 8000.
Q -
With reference to your article on MS (top left), are you able to throw
light on the current research now being undertaken both in the UK and worldwide
on this possibly auto-immune disease? What is the anticipated rate of progress,
and are there any genuine signs of success? How can I keep fully updated?
Edward Boroughs,
Soberton
A - I
think that the greatest sign of success in the treatment of MS is the development
of the beta interferons and Copaxone. A huge amount of research is
being undertaken into MS and, of course, into other auto-immune and demyelinating
diseases. When the answer to this terrible disease will be found
nobody knows, but it will be sooner or later.
Q - Your
recent cogent article goes some way to explaining the Multiple Sclerosis
Society's almost total preoccupation with remitting-relapsing MS. Until
such time as a cure (or at least a palliative treatment) is found for progressive
MS, could I ask for your suggestions on how best to cope with a tremor
in one hand? For me, this is getting so acute that I can no longer use
a pen or a knife and fork. I am beginning to find this even more debilitating
than my wheelchair, so any suggestions you may have would be more than
welcome.
Mark Brown,
London
A - I
am very sorry to hear about the problems you have in controlling fine movements
in one hand because of the tremor. I am not at all surprised
that you find the tremor more disabling and a greater interference to your
life than the weakness in your lower limbs which has led the wheelchair.
I assume that
you are attending a neurologist and have tried the usual treatments.
You will be aware that cannabis extracts are recommended by some doctors
to treat disabilities just such as yours. I am opposed to the recreational
use of cannabis because of its adverse effects, but am very much in favour
of the research work now being carried out on it for medicinal purposes
and hope these will be successful in cases such as yours.
Q -
My 30-year old niece has had her first attack of MS at the age of 22. This
was a severe attack which required hospitalisation for two weeks. The main
feature, apart from tingling and numbness in the body, was excessive salivation.
The doctors were unable to confirm MS at that stage. Even later through
scanning of the brain and spine there are no expected signs of myelin destruction.
There is still a question mark hanging over her condition.
She is being
treated by a German doctor who favours alternative treatment, such as taking
Wobenzym. Taking these enzymes seems, so far, to control the disease. If
she stops or reduces the tablets symptoms, such as difficulty walking,
return. What if any, are the alternative treatments in the UK?
Anita Watts,
Brussels, Belgium
A -
The diagnosis of MS can be much more difficult than is supposed.
There is no 100 per cent certain way of making the diagnosis although the
MRI scanner has made diagnosis much more certain than it used to be.
I am not surprised therefore, without any MRI evidence of the disease,
that a question mark still hangs over her condition.
In general,
German doctors do tend to favour alternative therapies more than we do
in the UK. However, as we can’t be certain of the diagnosis we can’t either
be certain what effects the enzyme she is taking have on the underlying
condition.
In all cases,
the essential first step is to have a firm diagnosis and then the question
of treatment can be discussed. Every good wish.
Q -
In the new trial of beta interferon (if it goes ahead), will treatment
be available to all R/R patients in the UK, or will people be treated differently,
depending on Scottish or English residency?
Hana Rosemount,
Glasgow
A -
There are differences between English and Welsh, and Scottish National
Health Service treatments and you have raised an important point about
the trial involving patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
I would be surprised if people were treated differently north of the border
and if they were not incorporated into the trial, but I would suggest that
you either ring up the national helpline (0808 800 8000), or the MS Society
of Scotland (0131 472 4106) for the definitive answer. Good luck
with the beta interferon. I have had patients whose life has been
revolutionised by it.
Q -
In answer to Anne Barrett's question you say that research into diet has
been disappointing, but isn't it true that in effect there have been no
major research studies undertaken into diet and it's efficacy in treating
MS? This is mainly due to the lack of drug company sponsorship.
Shouldn't the
Goverment step in to fund research which will help prove, once and for
all, whether diet can be an effective alternative to expensive drugs?
Brian Pile,
Leicester
A -
There was widespread research into one particular diet, much advocated
some years ago, and despite the claims made for it there is no evidence
that it helped. In general, I would agree with you that there hasn't been
a careful analysis of all the many diets suggested from time to time to
treat MS, nor is there any convincing evidence that they do work.
Dietary supplements
of linoleic acid have also, in the past, been claimed to reduce the severity
of relapses but the trials have also shown that this is not effective.
Others have claimed that a low animal fat diet is helpful, but there isn't
any convincing trial which show the validity of these claims.
It must be
remembered that with any disease that has such a variable outcome, and
which may run so many different courses with long periods of remission,
it is very difficult to conduct trials.
Copyright 2001 Times Newspapers
Ltd