http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10072/bibs/1022002/10220179.htm
Neurological Sciences
Abstract Volume 22 Issue 2 (2001)
pp 179-185
E. Granieri (1), I. Casetta (2),
M. R. Tola (1), P. Ferrante (2)
(1) Department of Neurology, University
of Ferrara, I-44100 Ferrara, Italy
(2) Don C. Gnocchi Foundation, IRCCS,
University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Abstract.
In the search for the etiology of
multiple sclerosis (MS), consideration has been given in turn to infectious
agents, to genetic markers, and more recently to a combination of genetic
and environmental factors, but after over a century of research, a definite
conclusion has not been reached.
The hypothesis that an infectious
agent is responsible for triggering MS is perhaps one of neurology's most
enduring notions. Interest in an infectious etiology has waxed and waned
over the last two centuries since Pierre Marie first proposed that MS often
starts as an infectious process.
The possible role of infectious agents
has been suggested by:
Incidence rates have remained stable
in some areas, but have changed over time in other regions.
On the other hand, the hypothesis
is hampered by the lack of evidence for a specific agent, and the weakness
of the results of analytical studies that have tested the association between
MS and previous infections.
Despite these drawbacks, recent studies
of a few select pathogens suggest that viral or bacterial infections or
reactivations may trigger clinical exacerbations in relapsing-remitting
MS.
© Springer-Verlag Italia 2001
The infectious hypothesis is strongly
supported by the different temporal patterns of the disease in different
geographic areas.