More
MS news articles for Nov 2001
Medical
journals take a stand against the pharmaceutical industry
http://www.mssociety.org.uk/research/news_in_research/medicaljournals.html
25 November 2001
Thirteen leading medical journals
have published a joint article accusing the pharmaceutical industry of
jeopardising clinical research, by putting financial interests first. The
evidence suggests that:
-
Trials funded by companies are more
likely to generate positive results.
-
Negative results are less likely to
be published by companies.
-
Companies run their own trials because
it is cheaper than paying academics, and because it also allows them to
control the trials in ways that are not always in the best interests of
the participants, investigators or scientific research itself.
-
Researchers often accept the situation
because if they don’t, the commercial sponsor will find someone else who
will.
To prevent this unethical practice,
many journals are adopting the following measures:
-
They will only publish papers if the
researchers, not the commercial sponsor, decide what gets published.
-
The authors will be asked to sign a
statement, declaring that they accept full responsibility for the way the
trial has been carried out and its’ results.
-
Clinical trials will registered on the
web so that they can be monitored as they go along, making it harder for
facts to be changed at a later date.
The pharmaceutical industry has responded
positively, generally supporting the policies set out by the journals.
The main message from these findings is that:
-
Research should be carried out to high
standards.
-
Results should be published whether
they are good or bad.
-
The public should not be mislead by
the results of research.
Journals who participated in this joint
editorial included The Lancet, NEJM, BMJ, and JAMA.