http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/010622/l22527453_3.html
Friday June 22, 12:37 pm Eastern
Time
LONDON/ZURICH, June 22 (Reuters)
- Swiss-based Serono SA locked horns with U.S. firm Biogen Inc (NasdaqNM:BGEN
- news) on Friday in an increasingly bitter scientific and legal battle
over whose drug is better for treating multiple sclerosis.
Defying a court injunction, Europe's
biggest biotechnology group repeated claims that patients treated with
its MS drug Rebif were less likely to suffer relapses than those on Biogen's
Avonex.
Biogen -- currently the global leader
in the MS medicine market -- said Serono risked hefty fines, and its executives
potential imprisonment, for violating the Geneva court order.
Serono, which based its claims on
further data from a head-to-head clinical trial, needs to prove Rebif's
superiority over Avonex to have a chance of entering the $1 billion-a-year
U.S. market for MS drugs by breaking Avonex's "orphan drug" exclusivity
which runs out in mid-2003.
Geneva-based Serono first said in
May the trial showed Rebif was better, and it reiterated on Friday that
Rebif patients had 90 percent greater odds of remaining relapse-free than
those on Avonex. Some 32 percent fewer patients on Rebif experienced a
relapse, it said.
"The...study results are highly
significant and further demonstrate the clinical efficacy of Rebif," Serono
Chief Executive Ernesto Bertarelli said in a statement issued in London,
where the data were released at a scientific conference.
"We will shortly be submitting this
data to the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) for the review in our effort
to make Rebif available to patients in the United States."
SUBMISSION TO FDA
Andrew Galazka, Serono's senior vice
president for scientific affairs, told Reuters the company would submit
the data to the FDA in the third quarter of this year and was upbeat on
prospects the U.S. agency would approve it.
"We did the (trial) on the understanding
that this would be sufficient, so provided they come to the same conclusion
about this trial as our analysis of it has been so far, then I think they
will give us approval early but I cannot repeat enough it is their call,"
he said.
"I wouldn't be so presumptuous to
say this is a done deal. It is really up to the FDA now," he said, reiterating
Serono's view that a U.S. launch for Rebif by the middle of 2002 was possible
if all went smoothly.
Serono stock briefly advanced to
an eight-month high of 1,810 Swiss francs on the latest news before slipping
to close at 1,755. Biogen was off 6.5 percent at $62.47 by 1610 GMT.
"MISLEADING CLAIMS"
Biogen said the claims made by Serono
were misleading and said it believed the data was unlikely to be enough
to overturn its exclusive market position.
The Cambridge, Mass.-based company
had sought to prevent Serono from repeating the claims via a court order
obtained in Geneva on Thursday.
She said the Biogen would now inform
the public prosecutor in Geneva who had authority to enforce the court
order.
Bertarelli said in a conference call
that Biogen was being "deliberately obstructive" and described the injunction
as "a below-the-belt manoeuvre".
"The risk we are taking is to pay
a fine, but obviously we have a chance to explain the purpose of our presentation
to the judge and we don't think we are going to be fined," he said.
Jeffrey Greenstein, professor of
neurology at Temple School of Medicine at Philadelphia, told Reuters he
shared Biogen's concerns over the way the study was carried out.
He said it was not properly blinded
and was therefore subject to bias, as patients knew which drugs they were
on.
The row continued after study investigator
and New York professor of neurology Patricia Coyle presented the results
to World Neurology Congress.
During questions from the floor,
one neurologist criticised the "haste and serious bias" of the open-label
study and questioned how could have confidence in the results. Coyle said
the criticism was "ridiculous".
ANALYSTS CAUTIOUS
Financial analysts had expected the
new data to support Serono's claim that Rebif has some advantages over
Avonex and that the market would take the news positively.
But they were wary on whether it
would suffice to help Serono break Avonex's "orphan drug" protection,
what kind of the label the drug could expect, and whether the data would
add anything to existing market expectations for the product.
Orphan drug status is designed to
promote development of medicines to treat rare diseases or conditions by
protecting them from competition for certain periods.
UBS Warburg said the data were better
than it had expected, which would heighten expectations Serono could carry
the day.
"However, despite very positive
six month-data, we continue to be cautious. The FDA decision is politically
sensitive, and thus has the potential to disappoint unexpectedly," it
said.
(Additional reporting by Richard
Woodman and Toni Clarke in New York)
By Ben Hirschler and Michael Shields