Posted 27 Jun 2000,
The first major political-attitude survey of people with disabilities -- 54 million Americans who could be viewed as the nation's largest minority group -- reveals distinctive opinions and potential clout largely untapped by parties and candidates.
People with disabilities were found to be more liberal than the general population, but the study, published in the new issue of the journal Social Science Quarterly, also reveals a strong streak of skepticism about government.
"For Democrats, this is yet another case of a community they shouldn't take for granted," said study author John Gastil, a University of Washington assistant professor of speech communication. "The Republicans might be able to tap into this group's frustration with bureaucracy and the inability of government to meet their needs."
The findings were based on telephone surveys of 302 people with disabilities and 1,485 people with no disability ages 18-64 in New Mexico, a state with party affiliations and election results that closely mirror the nation's as a whole.
In the surveys, 52 percent of those with disabilities identified themselves as Democrats and 23 percent as Republicans, compared with the general state population surveyed of 43 percent Democrats and 39 percent Republicans.
When questioned about specific issues, people with disabilities voiced more concern than other New Mexicans about health care. However, the group with disabilities also shared interests with the rest of the populace in issues such as education, crime and drug abuse.
"It overturns the stereotype that people with disabilities would be overwhelmingly focused on health care to the exclusion of other things," Gastil said.
Despite the diversity of experience and types of impairment -- from birth, or as a result of disease or accident -- a political group portrait emerged.
"A constituency group isn't effective in the long term," Gastil said, "unless it is understood."
Less Politically Active Than General Population
Hampering the clout of the disability community, however, is an attitude that was also commonly found among the survey group: that they feel they have little power to bring about political change and that involvement will do little good. The survey found that people with disabilities were, in fact, less likely to be involved in political activities than New Mexicans as a whole.
This attitude could mean there's room for political growth, Gastil said. For example, if Democrats offer an effective message about rights and services, they could garner stronger support from the millions of Americans with disabilities who follow politics but are uninvolved.
Republicans, meanwhile, might mine the vein of dissatisfaction with government ineffectiveness and red tape revealed in the survey and offer plans that stress efficiency and accountability. What George W. Bush did last week was to propose an $880 million "New Freedom" plan featuring home-purchase vouchers and telecommuting subsidies.
Gastil said no substantial study had ever before gauged political opinions of those with disabilities as a group until political questions were inserted into 1995 surveys by the University of New Mexico's Institute for Public Policy and state Division of Vocational Rehabilitation.
"A significant increase in the political involvement of people with
disabilities," Gastil writes, "could tip the scales of public opinion and
Copyright 2000 AScribe News Inc. Find out how to build political power
and follow the issues with the "CanVote: The Election 2000 Guide."