http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/198/science/When_illness_tests_marriage_vows+.shtml
By Judy Foreman, 7/17/2001
Several years ago, Dr. Michael J.
Glantz, a brain cancer specialist, was struck by what appeared to be an
extraordinary number of divorces and separations among his patients, many
of whom had primary brain tumors that were expected to kill them in 15
months.
Not only did there seem to be lots
of breakups, but most of them seemed to occur when the women got sick.
So, Glantz, who was then at Brown University and is moving this summer
to the University of Arizona, began keeping track.
To the surprise of his male but not
his female colleagues, Glantz found that 17 out of 183 married brain cancer
patients had endured a divorce or separation within about a year of their
diagnosis - an overall divorce rate of 9 percent. More importantly, he
said, 14 of the 17 divorced or separated patients - 82 percent - were women.
To see whether this was tied to something
particularly stressful about brain cancer, which can alter personality
and cognitive function, Glantz also studied two other groups: 107 married
patients with multiple sclerosis, a chronic disease that is not usually
fatal, and 172 married patients with cancers that neither arose in nor
had spread to the brain.
Divorces in those cases, too, he
found, disproportionately occurred when it was the wife who was sick -
96 percent of the cases with MS, 78 percent of the cases of systemic cancer.
One rather unappealing interpretation
is obvious: That women hang in there with sick husbands while men bail
out on sick wives. But stay with this a bit longer, guys. And, ladies,
don't despair. This is not heading to the all-men-are-cads conclusion you
may be expecting.
For years, when researchers probed
the emotional impact of cancer and other serious illnesses, they usually
focused on the patient. Today, there's a growing realization that, at least
in the emotional sense, it's the couple or the whole family that ''has''
the disease.
In fact, the well spouse sometimes
feels more distress than the sick one, who at least can throw his or her
efforts into survival. And, while some men do have trouble taking on the
nurturing role, researchers say, many do it quite well. In fact, many couples
get closer when one member has cancer, especially if the marriage was strong
to start with.
Beth and David Savard of Methuen
can vouch for that, though things got very shaky while she was in the midst
of chemotherapy for breast cancer six years ago. Both 35 now, they were
29 and the parents of a 2-year-old when Beth was diagnosed. David could
deal with the factual issues about cancer, she said, but he shut down emotionally.
''He was not talking about his feelings.
I was trying to talk about mine, but I couldn't talk to him because I was
not getting a response.''
They were about to see a divorce
lawyer when they went to a We Can Weekend, an annual family retreat sponsored
by the American Cancer Society. During that weekend, David began to talk
and cry with other men whose wives had cancer. He began to tell Beth how
helpless he felt, she recalled. He even voiced the most frightening feeling
of all - that she would die and he would have to raise their child alone.
Many couples say that ''when cancer
came in, communication went out,'' Beth Savard said. But it needn't be
that way. Today, Beth said, she and David are ''very, very talkative. We
share a lot.''
Having cancer or a spouse with cancer,
particularly brain cancer, has ''got to be the most stressful thing in
the world,'' said Dr. John Henson, executive director of the brain tumor
center at Massachusetts General Hospital. And generally, he has found,
couples are extremely supportive of each other.
But often, he said, the spouse with
cancer often has some level of denial, ''which is probably a healthy coping
mechanism.'' The healthy spouse even may be more emotionally affected,
something that Henson said has nothing to do with gender.
Frank McCaffrey, a clinical social
worker who runs support groups at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
for men whose wives have advanced cancer, agreed. If the spouse who gets
cancer has historically been the one who has provided most of the emotional
caretaking, he said, the well spouse, regardless of gender, ''has to evolve
and be able to understand that the patient, the ill spouse, can't provide
the same emotional caring and support that they have been.''
Not surprisingly, this is easier
if the marriage is good to start with. ''If the marriage was teetering
before, it gets harder. They are the ones at most risk,'' said Dr. Jimmie
Holland, chief of psychiatry and behavioral science at Memorial Sloan-Kettering
Cancer Center in New York.
Even Glantz's data, alarming as it
seems at first blush, does not actually prove that the divorce rate is
higher than normal among couples in which one spouse has cancer or MS.
If anything, the opposite may be
true.
According to data released in May
by the National Center for Health Statistics, 43 percent of first marriages
end in separation or divorce within 15 years; 20 percent end within five
years.
It's statistically risky to compare
national divorce rates, which include many young couples, with divorce
rates in couples in which one spouse gets a serious disease, in part because
the latter couples are often older, and possibly more mature. But Glantz's
study suggests that couples dealing with at least one serious illness,
MS, have a lower than average divorce rate, just 24 percent after a median
of 14 years of followup.
That doesn't surprise Steven Marcus,
58, a free-lance editor in Brookline who has been married for 25 years
to Kit Crowe, 51, a librarian who was diagnosed with MS just after their
marriage. In recent years, he said, Kit has not been able to work full
time, and ''it's been scary for me to be the primary wage-earner - that
freaks me out sometimes.''
But splitting up has never crossed
is mind.
''You do the best you can,'' he said.
''It's a question of love. Even if you're freaked out, that's not enough
to make you run.''
And even when a couple divorces soon
after the woman gets cancer, that doesn't prove that her husband abandoned
her.
Laurel Northouse, a nurse with a
doctorate in research who studies the impact of cancer on couples at the
University of Michigan School of Nursing, has studied couples in which
the wife has breast cancer. She has found not only that the divorce rate
within the first 12 months of diagnosis is a fairly low 3 to 4 percent,
but that sometimes it's the woman who decides not to spend whatever time
she has left with a man she no longer loves.
A divorce soon after cancer may look
''like the husband is leaving her, but she may be saying, `Enough already,'''
Northouse said.
In a study of colon cancer published
last year, she said, female care givers of men with cancer actually reported
more distress than their husbands. One reason for that, Northouse said,
is that when husbands become care givers, they are often seen as heroes
doing more than society expects.
''Nobody brings casseroles to women
when their husbands are sick because people assume a woman can do the caretaking,
that she's a natural care giver. But women need help, too.''
On the other hand, when men become
care givers, they often don't ask for the support they need because they
may be too stoic, said Betty Ferrell, a nurse-researcher at City of Hope
National Medical Center in Duarte, Calif. Men ''really do feel the financial
burden. They feel they must try to keep things normal, to keep going to
work.''
The bottom line is that when life-threatening
disease strikes, the marriage needs attention as well as the disease itself,
said psychologist David Cella of Northwestern University Medical School.
''It's very easy for people to put all the attention on the treatment.
But some attention should be spared to focus on the couple.''
The American Cancer Society is enrolling
volunteers in a new study of quality of life among cancer survivors and
their families. Call 1-800-ACS-2345. Judy Foreman's column appears every
other week in Health & Science. Her past columns are available on Boston.com
and www.myhealthsense.com. Her e-mail address is foreman@globe.com.
This story ran on page C1 of the
Boston Globe on 7/17/2001.
© Copyright 2001 Globe Newspaper
Company.