http://www.nice.nhs.uk/article.asp?a=26812
Issued: 25 January 2002
The National Institute for Clinical
Excellence has today announced that the appeals against the Institute's
Final Appraisal Determination on the use of beta interferon and glatiramer
acetate for multiple sclerosis, heard on 26th November 2002, have not been
upheld.
The Appeal Panel's decision has been
published today.
Andrew Dillon, Chief Executive, NICE,
said, "The decision of the Appeal Panel means that the conclusions set
out in the Final Appraisal Determination will form the basis of the Institute's
guidance to the NHS in England and Wales. NICE will issue its guidance
on Monday 4th February 2002.
The Institute's provisional determination
in August 2001, suggested that the Department of Health, the National Assembly
for Wales, and manufacturers should consider how they could enable any
or all of these drugs, to be secured for patients in a cost effective manner.
We are pleased that the Department
of Health acted on the Institute's advice and have entered into discussions
with manufacturers. Since the Institute has not been party to these discussions
I am unable to comment on them further"
Notes for editors
Background
1. The following documents
relating to this appraisal are available on the NICE website at www.nice.org.uk:
NICE 2001/003
Press release
Decision
of Appeal heard 28 November 2001 - January 2002
Provisional
Appraisal Determination - August 2001
Final
Appraisal Determination - November 2001
Guidance
for appellants - March 2000
Key
dates and activities in this appraisal to date - January 2002
2. The appraisal process followed
by the Institute allows for submissions from manufacturers, groups that
represent patients and professional organisations. It also provides for
periods of consultation, feedback, and appeal should it be required.
3. The Institute's provisional
and final determinations on Interferon beta and glatiramer in MS (published
in August and October respectively www.nice.org.uk), encouraged the Department
of Health to consider, with manufacturers, a strategy to acquire any or
all of the medicines appraised in a manner that could be considered to
be cost effective. The NHS has cash limited budgets and the procurement
of technologies and products plays an important part in the overall application
of resources in a fair and efficient way. We are pleased to see from the
media reports that the Department and the manufacturers have begun these
discussions. The Institute has not been involved in the discussions between
the Department of Health and the manufacturers; therefore we are unable
to comment, as we have not seen the detail of the scheme.
Requests for further information
on the Department of Health's negotiations with manufacturers should be
directed to the Department of Health's press office.
4. The consultees in this
appraisal are:
The Appeal.
5. The Final Appraisal Determination
was sent to the consultees on Monday 29th October 2001 and was published
on the NICE website on Friday 2nd November 2001. The consultees had until
14th November 2001 to lodge an appeal against the guidance if they believed
that the Institute:
6. Appeals were lodged by
the following appellants:
All the appellants were represented
at the appeal hearing with the exception of the Neurological Alliance.
The MS Society communicated the views of the Neurological Alliance on its
behalf.
7. The Appeal Panel convened
on 26th November 2001 to consider these appeals. The Appeal Panel comprised
Professor Sir Michael Rawlins (chair of the Appeal Panel and chair of the
Institute), Mrs Mary McClarey and Ms Mercy Jeyasingham (non-executive directors
of the Institute's Board), Mrs Gill Donovan (patient representative) and
Dr Peter Brock (industry representative).
Copyright ©2002 National Institute
for Clinical Excellence