More MS news articles for February 2001

Predictive Value of Lesions for Relapses in Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11156770&dopt=Abstract

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001 Feb;22(2):284-291
Koziol JA, Wagner S, Sobel DF, Slivka LS, Romine JS, Sipe JC, Adams HP

Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine (J.A.K., S.W., L.S.S., J.C.S., H.-P.A.), The Scripps Research Institute, the Department of Radiology (D.F.S.) and the Division of Neurology (J.S.R., J.C.S.), Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, and the Department of Neurology (S.W.), Ruprecht-Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent studies have suggested that enhancing lesions on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images are predictive of impending exacerbations in cases of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. We examined whether enhancing lesions, new enhancing lesions, and new hypointense lesions ("black holes") could accurately predict exacerbations in a cohort of 50 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis within a time frame of up to 6 months.

METHODS: Data were obtained from 50 patients with relapsing-remitting disease. All patients underwent monthly MR imaging and clinical examinations for a period of 12 months. Putative predictors of clinical relapse were defined from enhancing lesions, new enhancing lesions, and new black hole outcomes, and their operating characteristics were studied.

RESULTS: Overall, the positive predictive values (PV+) of enhancing lesions, new enhancing lesions, or new black holes for an exacerbation did not exceed 0.25 and the negative predictive values (PV-) were all near 0.9. The best predictor for new enhancing lesions was the occurrence of new enhancing lesions in each of the previous 3 months (PV+: 0.79 [95% confidence interval, 0.651-0.90 ; PV-: 0.83 [95% confidence interval, 0.751-0.887]). Similarly, new black holes were predicted best by the occurrence of new black holes in each of the previous 2 months (PV+: 0.54 [95% confidence interval: 0.372-0.697]; PV-: 0.85 [95% confidence interval, 0.790-0.896]).

CONCLUSION: None of the MR markers could predict an impending relapse with any reasonable degree of precision. Rather, the absence of MR markers is associated with a more favorable clinical course (ie, fewer relapses).

PMID: 11156770