http://www.ajnr.org/cgi/content/abstract/22/10/1893
American Journal of Neuroradiology
22:1893-1900 (November 2001)
Alexander C. Guoa, Valerie L. Jewellsa
and James M. Provenzalea
a From the Department of Radiology,
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:
Our purpose was to compare diffusion
tensor MR and magnetization transfer imaging in assessing normal-appearing
white matter (WM) regions in multiple sclerosis (MS).
METHODS:
Diffusion tensor, magnetization transfer,
and conventional MR imaging were performed in 12 patients with MS. Fractional
anisotropy, apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs), and magnetization transfer
ratios (MTRs) were measured in plaques, normal-appearing periplaque WM
(PWM) regions, and normal-appearing WM regions remote from plaques. Mean
fractional anisotropy, ADCs, and MTRs were calculated and compared in WM
regions.
RESULTS:
Fractional anisotropy was lower in
normal-appearing PWM regions than in remote WM regions (P < .001) but
higher than in plaques (P < .001). MTRs were lower (not significantly,
P = .19) in normal-appearing PWM regions than in remote regions. MTRs were
higher in normal-appearing PWM regions than in plaques (P < .001). ADCs
were higher in normal-appearing PWM regions than in remote regions (P =
.008) but lower than in plaques (P = .001). Correlation between fractional
anisotropy and MTRs of individual lesions was poor (r = 0.18) and between
fractional anisotropy and ADC, modest (r = -0.39).
CONCLUSION:
In MS, diffusion tensor MR imaging
can depict differences between WM regions that are not apparent on conventional
MR images. Anisotropy measurements may be more sensitive than those of
MTRs in detecting subtle abnormalities in PWM.
Copyright © 2001 by the American
Society of Neuroradiology.